Never Seen that Many Dishes
Blogroll, Germai Medhanie, Immigration
Around Christmas time 1979, I had my first job in the United States. I was happy to have a job but it was also the most depressing time in my life. When I had flown in from Khartoum, Sudan, on July 26th, I had been dreaming about the freedom and fun I would have in America. I thought that coming here would be the end of my hardship — I was naïve. My struggle just began as I took my first job, as a dishwasher, at Curious Jane’s Restaurant, on the corner of Elm and State Street in New Haven, Connecticut.
Before I landed to my first job, as a dishwasher, I had been looking for a position in accounting or finance, something that related to my educational background. I had graduated from high school in Asmara, Eritrea, with four years of business school training, to prepare me for such a job. But I found out that that logic does not quite translate to all people. I recognized that life is full of surprises – at times, it is very political – and that I had to be resourceful. I had to take a job to survive and pay for my school. That was the only way to stay in the United States – I had to take the dishwashing job, and make the best of it.
On my first day in the kitchen, I didn’t even know how to turn on the dishwasher machine. As someone who had lived in a country where we eat on one big plate with our fingers, I was stunned by the volume of dishes and utensils that kept getting delivered to me. I couldn’t understand it; it was beyond my imagination. The types of plates, forks, and spoons were all new to me. I didn’t really see the use of different types of spoons and forks. I wondered if that was what “civilization means” – I smiled as I was loading the machine!
I was a new face at the restaurant and all the workers were asking me what my name was and where I came from. They were all white, and I had a very hard time telling them apart (the only other Black worker was the morning dishwasher). Too many people and too many questions, it would have been a lot easier for me if I wrote my name and where I came from on a big sheet of paper, and then posted it on the dishwasher machine next to the instructions on how to operate the machine. The restaurant had very good food; at least, that is what people said. The chefs were kind to me. I pretty much ordered whatever I wanted to eat. True, I wasn’t familiar with their menu so I order the only dish I was familiar with, a hamburger with a french fries, pickles, and ketchup. I was happy to have a free meal because I was paid the minimum wage, $3.37 an hour.
I started work at 3.00 pm, after having gone to the day’s business classes at South Central Community College. The kitchen closed at 10.00 pm, and the bar closed at 1.00 am. I worked four nights a week: Thursday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. Every night, I started to wrap-up at 9.30 pm, and punched out at 10.15 pm. After work, I liked to have one or two free beers in their bar, and enjoy their jazz and blues music – it was my way of becoming an American, and the music absolutely reflected my mood and connected me to African American experiences.
All of the waitresses were white and most of them were students. They were young and beautiful, and I had a few crushes but I didn’t pursue any of them. I was afraid to approach them, and I was in fear and in pain from leaving my partner in the Sudan. By midnight, I was happy to walk alone home.
I used to live on Edgewood Avenue, across from Edgewood Park. As I walked I would think about my future, wondering when my life would get easier. I usually took the same route every night. As I left the restaurant, I lit my cigarette. I was new to the weather. I was used to the sun being warm. It was my first time to see snow — I was never ready for it, and to keep myself warm, I lit Marlboro cigarettes one after the other. It took me four or five years to learn how to dress to keep myself warm in the wintertime, and get used to the discomfort of bulky winter clothes.
Going home, I usually crossed the New Haven Green diagonally, two churches on my right and one church in my left – it was always uplifting when as I reached to the church, and I felted protected and at peace.
Being new, I knew only a few streets. I used to take Chapel Street to go to my home. It was a street where the action was: bookstore, bars, prostitutes and police. For me, it was a jungle and I had to be alert until I got home. Every time I arrived home safely, I felt thankful. I spent a few moments reflecting on my day with my housemates, who were also from Asmara, before I slept. Every weekend I bought a self-help, psychology or philosophy book and read it; this reading was core to my sanity, balancing out all those mindless and depressing hours in the kitchen and my boring morning classes.
One night, the restaurant was very busy. I was new and slow. All the waitresses and cooks wanted clean dishes. I was doing the best I could. But there was no way I could deliver clean dishes at their speed – everyone was screaming – I smiled! Then, Cathy, one of the waitresses, started to wash dishes with me. She knew I had a crush on her, and she had come to my place once, and it was nice to be close to her and work side by side. We started to talk and get to know each other better but my heart was still back with my fiancée in Khartoum, Sudan.
After a lot of dishes, I accepted the reality that life in America would not be easy. The work was hard: the kitchen was hot, too many plates to wash, and the pots were greasy, and my skin started to itch from the grease – absolutely, it was the most disgusting job I ever had. But after being broke, and not having money to pay for school, I was happy to have a job.
Germai Medhanie July 23, 2007 at 10:51 am
“Even so, affluenza has reached the point where government interference is necessary to control these wants…”
This statement makes me nervous. I agree that government interference will be a part of the “cure” for affluenza, but I think it needs to have more to do with controlling firms rather than people. The concept of a government controlling the “wants” of the people brings to mind several failed experiments – Cuba, for example. People have natural “wants” that for the most part are perfectly reasonable – we want to be comfortable, we want to be well-liked, we want to be happy. The problem is when unregulated firms go out and advertise, brainwash and capitalize on those wants, attaching false solutions to them. We will be comfortable if we have a big house and an expensive car, we will be well-liked if we wear designer clothing, we will be happy if we keep buying things that make us happy. Yes, now these attachments or amendments to our wants are fully internalized by the public, but I think it makes more sense for the government to go about addressing the cause of the problem – advertisement and unregulated firms, rather than the effect – a public that buys unnecessary and unhealthy products.
I like the idea of limiting options to children, but I think it would be even more effective in the long-run to limit the amount of advertising of unhealthy foods that reaches children. It’s a good first step to take unhealthy food out of school, but the children are still being inundated with advertising outside of school. Kids tend to want what they can’t have, especially when they know what it is and that other kids like it.
Lauren, I really appreciate your comment, but I think you may have misunderstood what I was saying. If you read on, I clearly say that the government can’t control the wants (desires) of the people directly. What I was trying to say in the phrase you commented on was that the government will be necessary to control affluenza (whether that be by a carbon tax, limiting the food options to children, or by controlling advertising–which I think is a very good point). I meant that the government (in some cases) will have to control the wants in an indirect way by controlling the causes. I should have been much more explicit in saying that. Thank you for drawing that to my attention.
Sorry for nitpicking about the wording, Ali. I definitely agree with what you are saying. I’m sort of having an inner debate right now about how much government regulation I want in general and I think I took it out on you!
I think it’d be cool to do something like an ad campaign to teach children about healthy consumption, a mix between regulating advertisement and regulating consumption.
I, too, find it especially interesting to consider the role of government intervention in the context of both affluenza and our country’s current financial situation. We live in a country that very much values capitalism and individualism. Many people are very wary of government intervention and its potential to “rob” the individual of rights and infringe upon our personal freedoms. With lingering Cold War-era taboos against communism and socialism, some people look very negatively upon the notion of government control. However, I believe that the government should hold the fundamental role of acting in the best interest of its citizens. In that context, the government should step in and enact programs that promote the overall well-being of the people. I agree that, in fighting against affluenza and strengthening our country’s economy, government action is necessary and has the potential to bring about a great deal of positive change.